Evaluation: Introduction to Good Research Practice – Protecting Scientific Integrity BGZ-Workshop: "Introduction to Good Research Practice – Protecting Scientific Integrity" on January 19 (or 23), 2026, online The workshop was clearly and conclusively structured. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree The content was conveyed in an interesting and comprehensive manner. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree The theoretical and practical parts were well balanced. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree I learned new techniques/methods and gained new insights which I will be able to apply in the future. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree The extent of the workshop program was appropriate. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Comments on the workshop's extent (if necessary). In the future, I would prefer the following format for this workshop: Online In-person No preference I would recommend the workshop. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Altogether, I think the lecturer was . . . Excellent Good Average Poor Terrible Altogether, I think the workshop was . . . Excellent Good Average Poor Terrible In the future, I would prefer the following format as part of the Doctorate plus program . . . Online Rather online Online and in-person (both formats are suitable) Rather in-person In-person What did you especially like? What do you think could be improved? What other topics would you like to see in our skills and training program Doctorate plus? Send UniID Bitte füllen Sie dieses Feld mit dem im Platzhalter angegebenen Beispielformat aus. Die Telefonnummer wird gemäß der DSGVO verarbeitet.
